Write ads and gather proof 7 of 26 in this group
SOP 39
Write what an ad says, who says it, and when
What this page is for. Use it to build the middle of an advertisement — everything between the call-out that stops somebody and the instruction that tells them what to do. What you get is an ideation framework rather than a fill-in-the-blanks script. It is built to hand you more angles than one advertisement can hold, and then you choose.
SOP-39-Write-what-an-ad-says-who-says-it-and-when.md
1. Where this sits, and the test the middle has to pass
The call-out has already done its work — the words on SOP 32, the images, sound and setting on SOP 33. The reader has noticed. Now they have to become interested.
The test is a comparison rather than a verdict on quality. Somebody values an offer or a lead magnet when they read big benefits and tiny costs into it, and does not value it when the costs outweigh the benefits. So a good advertisement works both sides at once: it makes the benefits look as large as they can honestly be made to look, and the costs look as small.
2. The three parts, in order
| Part | The question it answers |
|---|---|
| 1. The what | Which benefit or which cost is being shown |
| 2. The who | Whose eyes it is shown through |
| 3. The when | Which point on their own timeline it is shown at |
Put the three together and they answer why the reader should be interested at all.
3. The what — four value elements, worked as eight
Begin from the four value elements: dream outcome, perceived likelihood of achievement, time delay, and effort and sacrifice. Running them as a diagnostic on an offer is SOP 3. Here they are reshuffled — each written once as the good side and once as its opposite, which gives eight.
| The good side | Its opposite |
|---|---|
| Dream outcome | Nightmare |
| Perceived likelihood of achievement | Risk |
| Speed | Time delay |
| Ease | Effort and sacrifice |
Said as carrots and sticks: the carrot is everything they want more of — more dream, faster, easier, more likely. The stick is everything they want less of — less nightmare, less slow, less hard, less risky.
3.1 Dream outcome, and the nightmare beside it
Show and tell the largest benefit somebody can get out of the thing you sell. It has to line up with what the ideal prospect actually dreams of for that kind of product or service: these are the results they live in after they buy.
Then run it backward. Show the worst of the hassle and the pain they carry by going without — what they experience if they do not buy, and what the road looks like if they keep walking down it. This is at its strongest where the problem gets worse over time, which is a condition on the tactic, not a decoration.
3.2 Likelihood, and the risk beside it
People assume that even a purchase can fail them, because purchases have failed them before. That assumption is why nobody buys everything. Lower it four ways:
| # | The move |
|---|---|
| 1 | Make past failures smaller, or explain them away |
| 2 | Show people like them succeeding |
| 3 | Give assurances — authority, and guarantees |
| 4 | Show that what you offer will at least improve their odds against what they do now |
Row 4 is the floor, not the promise: the claim is better odds than the status quo, and no more.
Backward: show how risky standing still is. What their life looks like if they carry on as they always have, how they repeat the failures they have already had, and how the problem grows.
3.3 Speed, and the time delay beside it
Show how slow their current path is — or that at this rate they never arrive at all. This is the half where you press on the pain. Then turn it over and show how much sooner they get the thing they want if they buy, or take just the next step.
3.4 Ease, and the effort and sacrifice beside it
Show what the job costs them without you: the work and the skill they would have to bring, the things they love that they would keep giving up, the things they hate that they would keep suffering — or worse, that they grind and sacrifice now and arrive nowhere.
Then the rule that governs the other side, stated as a definition: ease comes from an absence of required work or required skill. So if you can show somebody that a thing needs little effort and few qualifications, it will feel easy to them. A good advertisement disproves the assumption that getting what you want means doing what you hate and giving up what you love.
3.5 How much of the eight goes into one advertisement
Keep all of it short and compact. Beyond that, the readings pull against each other, and this page states both.
| Reading | What it says | What it costs you if it is the wrong one |
|---|---|---|
| The eight are a menu | Not all eight will be available or included in any one advertisement | You may leave out an element that was available and was worth having |
| The eight are a floor | Every advertisement will carry elements of each of the eight, and weaving in more of them seamlessly makes it stronger | You pack eight elements into a few seconds and lose the compactness this page asks for |
This page does not settle which reading is right. Also: you cannot hit all of them, and that is the point. That sits with the first reading and against the second.
The practice step that goes with the what. These eight are what to look for and listen for in the advertisements that are already working. How to record what you find is not covered on this page.
4. The who — status, and the people who hand it out
People are primarily status-driven, and one person's status comes out of how other people treat them. So the benefit is not only what the customer feels. It is what the people around the customer say about it.
The people who give and withhold status, in the order they are listed: spouse, kids, parents, extended family, colleagues, bosses, friends, rivals, competitors.
The method. Take one benefit — any one of the eight — and describe it from as many of those positions as you can. One benefit becomes many-sided without becoming a different benefit.
Why you need several. Motivation comes from deprivation: you are hungrier for what you have least of. You do not know which position your reader is starved in. They might have a marriage full of praise and a job where they are beaten up daily, so the spouse angle lands on full ground and the rival-at-work angle lands on empty. Play the spouse key, the rival key, the boss key, the kids key, the friendly-rival-parent key — as many of those keys as you can, to find the one that is being starved.
The worked example, in the weight-loss case. Speed, shown from inside: two months on, he takes in his belt and it goes two notches. Speed, shown from outside: his wife watches him do it and tells him he is doing well and that he might fit his old dinner suit. Money, shown from outside: earning more is one thing; the comment from a colleague as you arrive in the new car, or the reaction on the golf course to the new 400 driver, is the thing that actually lands — because that is status arriving from the people whose opinion he is chasing. Another turn of the same key: somebody back from a trip says you look well, and at the office the line is that people who lose weight are more likely to be promoted.
5. The when — past, present and future
People often weigh a decision against right now. To be more compelling than that, also say what their decisions already led to, and what today's decision could lead to. The way in is to walk them along their own timeline: past, present, future.
Same weight-loss case, three stops: how his wife thought of him when they married; how she sees him today; how she will see him once the weight is off. The negative version runs the same track — how the past attempts went, and the respect lost along the way.
The hard one, and it is named as hard. Negative visualization in the future is a tough move and an unusually compelling one. Worked through: you have put on five pounds a year, every year; five years from now you stand on the scale twenty-five pounds heavier; what does your wife think then, what do your kids think then, and what is it like if you can only watch while the other parent plays with your kids and theirs, because your ankle or your knee has gone? The arithmetic in that example holds: five pounds a year across five years is twenty-five pounds.
How many combinations this gives you. Not literally unlimited, but a very large number of angles exists, and you cannot use all of them.
6. Putting the three together
One sentence from the framework carries all three slots at once. Three of them, each tagged:
| The line | Who | What | When |
|---|---|---|---|
| Their spouse sees how fast they fit the suit she loves that did not fit before | Spouse | Speed | Future |
| Their kids, month after month, get keener on eating well and start tagging along to the workouts | Kids | Dream outcome | Present, repeated |
| They catch themselves in a mall window a few months in and find that the rack sizes fit | Themselves | Dream outcome | Future, arrived at |
Which form of the set is carried. This set appears in two forms. The first does not read as sentences; the second is clean and is the version above. Note also what the examples do and do not show: all three are benefits. The instruction around them says benefits and costs across past, present and future, but no cost example is worked.
7. How specific, and how long
Make the advertisement as specific as you can and no more specific than that. The trade is real: more specific copy is more efficient and tends to be longer, and copy too long for its platform gives back the efficiency it just bought. Where sound and pictures are available, they break the trade — that is on SOP 33.
8. What the framework does not decide for you
These are gaps in the procedure, not omissions from this page.
- Which of the eight to use in a given advertisement, and how many. No selection rule is given.
- Which status position to aim at. The instruction is to play many keys, not to pick one; no test is given for finding the starved one before you spend.
- How long is too long. The limit is set by the platform and no word count, character count or duration is attached to it.
- How to record what you find in the advertisements you study.
9. The checklist
| Question | The answer |
|---|---|
| Who runs this | You, or whoever writes the ads |
| What the middle of an ad has to do | Make benefits look big and costs look small |
| The three parts | The what, the who, the when — in that order |
| What the three together answer | Why they should be interested |
| How many value elements | Four |
| How many once the opposites are added | Eight |
| The four good sides | Dream outcome, perceived likelihood of achievement, speed, ease |
| The four opposites | Nightmare, risk, time delay, effort and sacrifice |
| What ease is | An absence of required work or required skill |
| Who hands out status | Spouse, kids, parents, extended family, colleagues, bosses, friends, rivals, competitors |
| Where motivation comes from | Deprivation — whichever position is starved |
| The three points on the timeline | Past, present, future |
| A tough but very compelling move | Negative visualization in the future |
| How many of the eight belong in one ad | Not established on this page |
| How many angles to write before you stop | Not established on this page |
| How long an ad may be | Not established on this page |
| How much lift any of this produces | This page gives no figure for the effect of the framework |
10. What this page does not cover
The call-out that comes before this section is on SOP 32 for words and SOP 33 for images, sound and setting, and how much of your effort belongs in the opening seconds is on SOP 34. The call to action that comes after it, and the reading level all of it is written at, are on SOP 31. SOP 35 covers choosing the platform, SOP 36 covers reaching the right people with it, and SOP 37 covers the page they arrive on. Running the four value elements as a diagnostic on the offer itself, rather than on the copy, is on SOP 3.
Budgets and split-test arithmetic are not covered on this page.
Terms defined on this page
- Deprivation
- The unmet want that drives a purchase. People act on what they have least of, so place the offer while the want is still open and make plain what not acting costs, rather than selling just after it is satisfied.
- Eight value elements
- The four value elements, each paired with its opposite: dream outcome and nightmare, likelihood and risk, speed and delay, ease and effort. The first of each pair is what buyers want more of; the second, less.
- Status positions
- The people whose treatment of someone gives or withholds status: spouse, children, parents, wider family, colleagues, bosses, friends, rivals and competitors. Show one benefit through several of them.
- Value elements
- The four value drivers; see that entry.