Choose the buyers and build the offer 12 of 12 in this group
SOP 230
Shape the front-end offer for lifetime value
What this page is for. Use it when you are deciding what a new customer meets first, and what goes into the offer itself, and you want those choices to raise what that customer is worth to you over time rather than lower it. It covers giving away things whose cost buyers already understand; why most free material lands on the buyer as a cost; running the numbers before you accept a loss up front; where, in the view here, AI belongs; what a discount does to lifetime value; how to judge each part of an offer; and a quick test that the whole offer is simple enough. Checking first that what a customer is worth is really what holds you back is SOP 225 — Pick your war and check lifetime value is the constraint.
SOP-230-Shape-the-front-end-offer-for-lifetime-value.md
1. Give away something whose cost is plain
Another strategy said to work very well: the loss leader. It is a little more advanced, since it takes some arithmetic. If you can hand out something buyers know carries an actual cost, in the view here the value in it is tremendous, and yet people still do not do it. The expectation offered is that almost nobody reading this will act on it; maybe one person will, and that person, it is claimed, will see numbers unlike anything they have seen before.
Another way to picture it. Offer five one-on-one calls, or three. Why is that worth so much to the buyer? Because people know a call with one person has a hard cost behind it. That is the key: the value is something nobody can bluff about.
That the offer, and the lead magnet in front of it, decide which leads arrive is SOP 229 — Sell to richer customers and rewrite what you measure, section 10.
2. Why most free material reads as a cost
Anyone who gives media away, a PDF or a training series "or whatever", says it is enormously valuable. Nobody else will ever rate it as highly as its maker, because the buyer meets two layers of friction on the way to the value:
- Getting through it. That alone costs something real. Ask a person to opt in and then spend an hour of their life on you, or two hours, or eight, and the thing is no longer free.
- Doing something with it. Only after they act on it do they see what it was worth.
Which is why, in the view here, the great majority of lead magnets cost the people who take them something, and the benefit does not actually reach them.
A prospect's time treated as a real investment is also on SOP 13 — Choose and build a lead magnet, section 1, and making the free thing easy to get through is section 7 of that page. Free material built to be sat through, and made to sell while it teaches, is SOP 65 — Convert a free consumption asset. A favored lead magnet here, handing out for nothing what others make you pay for, is in section 4.7 of SOP 209 — Pick a lead bucket, starting with the offer and lead magnet.
3. Run the numbers before you lose money up front
So ask what others charge for, whose true cost people can absolutely understand, and which you could give away. Then do the arithmetic, so you know in advance that you are willing to take a loss on it.
A loss on each unit, of whatever size, is acceptable in this view because the cost to acquire a customer might drop by 50 percent, or might drop by 80 percent. As long as those buyers can then be converted into something else, you win.
4. Keep AI behind the offer, not in the pitch
A tip to add here, offered as an opinion: the market has yet to shift. What follows is an aside. The view here is that everyone is doing AI wrong: people use it the wrong way to make money. They lead with an AI website development service, a consulting practice powered by AI, or whatever else, and nobody really cares. Buyers just want more leads, their accounting done faster, better creative. Announcing the AI is like telling people your secret sauce when all they want is the result. Keep that to yourself and keep the margin; that, in this view, is the right use of it.
One of the better places for it, in the view here: the lead magnet. People assume there is a cost behind it. Leave the AI unmentioned and they grow more likely to opt in, or to purchase; then use AI out of sight to make the thing good, fast or both, doing work that people would take for a person's. That, in this view, is how it needs doing.
Artificial intelligence, by this argument, is simply intelligence, the same as the human kind, and whether the person doing the job is clever changes nothing about the buyer's outcome. In one example, a buyer of a marketing agency just wants leads; if you can produce them more efficiently, that is good for that buyer.
5. What a discount does to lifetime value
A different front-end offer changes what a customer is worth. Some of you offer discounts, and one estimate is that buyers who come in on a discount are worth something like 40-ish percent less over their lifetime than those who pay the standard price. So check that what you spend to acquire them drops in proportion to that fall.
A discount also draws a different person. Some of you want to be premium while you run discount bait, and so pull in the wrong people. An example: a buyer after a really nice piece of jewelry sees 20 percent off and does not buy it. Discounts literally keep the whales away, the buyers with the most to spend, and some of your marketing works as a repellent on the very people you most want.
A prepay discount is another matter. A discount for paying a year in advance is fine, in the view here, and very different from announcing that you are running a special; the special is what this view is against.
Never changing your price on the spot to win a sale is SOP 96 — Answer a discount request and capture payment, section 1. The case for a discount so large it changes what people do, taken off something that costs the seller little, is SOP 209, section 4.6.
6. Each component must carry the price alone
The belief here is that buyers act as voters do when one issue decides their vote. Most people hear an offer, find in it the thing they want, and say yes or no on whether that is worth it. This matters for everyone.
In one test, buyers were asked which single part of one offer had made them buy. The answers varied: different people want different things.
So every component has to move the needle. You have to be able to argue that each one, taken alone, is truly worth the whole price or more; if it is not, leave it out of the offer. It can still go into delivery. You can give it to people simply to delight them, and that is absolutely fine: marketers and salespeople want to tell the buyer everything, but you can also just give people a great experience.
In one example, working through each component was probably what took longest in building an offer. Each had to be valuable enough that anyone reading or hearing the offer would say that one thing alone made it worth buying. Once your case rests on all of it taken together, you have already lost, because buyers cannot weigh things in the abstract. Make it specific: one decision about one item.
Cutting every option that is not high value, whatever it costs, is SOP 5 — Cut costly pieces from an offer and bundle the rest, section 3. Bonuses worth more than the core offer are SOP 6 — Build and present a bonus stack, section 2.
7. Fewer and better
Go through what you sell: if nine things sit in an offer, ask whether you could cut them to four and improve those four. Fewer and better, not more, and partly because people find it very hard to hold many variables in their heads at once.
7.1 Flag: how many items the offer shows
- This page: with nine things, ask whether four better ones would do; if two can sell it, do not have five.
- SOP 6, section 1: present a core thing with more beside it, so buyers see five items rather than one, because they judge by the count.
They give different instructions on how many items an offer should present. What each costs: fewer items, as here, forgo the count that SOP 6 says buyers use to judge worth; more items, as in SOP 6, add to what the buyer has to hold in mind while deciding. This page does not settle which reading is right.
8. Check each component against risk, speed and ease
For any service, always think each component through against three things: risk, speed and ease. For each one, ask what you do that achieves it.
- Risk. Lowering it does not have to mean a guarantee. It can mean handling, for the buyer, the other things they fear about succeeding.
- Speed. How could a component shorten the time it takes?
- Ease. How could it make things easier?
To be fair, some things can tick more than one of these boxes. An example that ticks all three (a bit of a trick question): help applying what the buyer has bought to their own business, with answers given at once. It lowers the risk that it will not work for them, it is easy to use, and it is fast. Written guides that let the buyer learn from somebody else, by contrast, to a degree answer speed, since learning from another person gets them there sooner, and they lower the risk too. As for ease, they probably do not really tick that box: the buyer still has to go and do the work. They do definitely help on risk and speed.
One practice here: of each component, always ask what it is really doing, and whenever an offer is being thought through, ask those three questions: how to make it faster, how to make it easier, and how to take more of the risk away.
Speed, risk and ease as the ground to beat a rival's offer on are SOP 209, section 3.1.
9. What a component really costs
What, in the view here, a lot of sellers, in general, get badly wrong: the largest cost of any part of an offer is the share of the buyer's attention it takes up while they decide. So if you can win the sale with two things, do not offer five.
10. Send the offer as a text message
One test: the whole offer must go to someone as a text message. That does not mean paragraphs. It has to fit on their screen so they can simply read it, and from that alone they must be able to reply yes or no.
- If they come back with questions, it needs more clarity, more elegance, more simplicity.
- If it runs over several screens, squeeze it down.
The aim is to get it as tight as it will go. In general, when you sell, needing to explain the offer is the sign that it is not yet simple enough; once the explaining starts, the practice here is to cut.
11. What this page does not decide for you
- The 40-ish percent. An estimate, offered as an opinion and as approximate. Whether it holds for your buyers: Not established on this page.
- How many components. Nine against four, and two against five, are examples. Whether either is a threshold: Not established on this page.
- Which of risk, speed and ease each of your components meets. This page gives no figure for how many boxes a component must tick.
12. The checklist
| Step | What to do |
|---|---|
| 1 | List things others charge for, whose cost your buyers can plainly see, that you could give away |
| 2 | Before taking a loss on each, work out how far acquisition cost might fall and whether you can convert those buyers into something else |
| 3 | If you use AI, keep it behind the offer and the lead magnet rather than in the pitch, as advised here |
| 4 | If you discount, check that acquisition cost falls in step with the drop in lifetime value; a prepay discount is acceptable here, a special is not |
| 5 | Ask of each component whether it is worth the whole price alone; if not, take it out of the offer (it can stay in delivery) |
| 6 | If the offer has many components, ask whether fewer, better ones could do the job |
| 7 | Check each component against risk, speed and ease |
| 8 | Text the offer to someone; if they ask questions or it runs past one screen, simplify |
13. What this page does not cover
Building the next sale into the offer and anchoring a price are SOP 231 — Build the next sale into the offer and anchor high. Other ways to raise what a customer is worth are SOP 232. Repeat buying is SOP 235 — Get customers to buy again: make it good, onboard, remind.
Terms defined on this page
- Loss leader
- Giving away something buyers know costs real money, such as three or five one-on-one calls, and taking a loss on each. Worth it if acquisition cost falls by perhaps 50 or 80 percent and those buyers go on to buy something else.
- Offer component
- Each part of an offer. You should be able to argue that each part alone is worth the whole price or more; if not, drop it from the offer, though it can stay in delivery to delight people.
- Risk, speed and ease
- Three things to test every offer part against: what lowers the buyer's risk (not only a guarantee), what shortens the time, and what makes it easier. Some parts meet more than one. Also called the vectors of value.
- Whale
- A customer who can be charged many times what others pay; the aim is many of them, such as 30 whales instead of 3,000 minnows. Discounts keep them away.